“Tinubu’s Policy On Age Limit For Tertiary Education Admission Belongs In The Stone Ages” —Atiku

By Daniel Dafe

Former Vice President, Abubakar Atiku has said that “the recent policy of the Federal Ministry of Education pegging age limits for entry to tertiary institutions is an absurdity and a disincentive to scholarship,” saying the policy belongs in the stine ages.

He said this in a statement on Wednesday.

According to the former vice president, “the policy runs foul of the notion of delineation of responsibilities in a federal system of government such as we are practicing.”

Adding that this “gives a graphic impression of how the Tinubu government behaves like a lost sailor on a high sea,” saying “otherwise, how is such anti-scholarship regulation the next logical step in the myriad of issues besetting our educational system?”

He continued: “To be clear, the Nigerian constitution puts education in the concurrent list of schedules, in which the sub-national government enjoys more roles above the federal government.

ALSO READ: DTSG Relesses 2024 Model School Entrance Examination Results

“Therefore, it is extra-constitutional for the federal government to legislate on education in a manner similar to a decree.

“The best global standard for such regulation is to allow the sub-national governments to make respective laws or rules on education.”

Furthermore, he said that “it is discouraging that even while announcing this obnoxious policy, the government inadvertently said it had no plan to cater for specially gifted pupils,” stating that the “statement is an embarrassment to the body of intellectuals in the country because it portrays Nigeria as a country where gifted students are not appreciated.”

“The irony here is that should the federal government play any role in education, it is to set up mechanisms that will identify and grant scholarships to gifted students not minding their ages before applying for admission into tertiary institutions.

“This controversial policy belongs in the Stone Ages and should be roundly condemned by everyone who believes in intellectual freedom and accessibility,” he concluded.