DSS Denies Arrest Role In Sowore’s Remand, Orders Investigation

The Department of State Services (DSS) has distanced itself from any direct role in the arrest and remand of activist and publisher, Omoyele Sowore, stating that the development was purely a product of court proceedings.

According to a statement on Tuesday signed by Favour Dozie, Deputy Director, Public Relations and Strategic Communications
State Services Headquarters, the Service, however, has ordered an internal investigation into a reported altercation involving its operatives during proceedings at the Federal High Court in Abuja on June 22, 2026, where Sowore was subsequently remanded in Kuje Prison.

In a statement, the DSS said public concerns have trailed the incident, particularly reports of a confrontation involving Sowore, a Correctional Service officer, and some security operatives within the court premises.

It explained that Sowore’s remand was linked to ongoing court processes in a case filed against him over alleged violations of Section 24 of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Amendment Act, 2024, bordering on alleged cyberbullying and disparaging comments against President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

According to the Service, the case originated from a social media post made by Sowore on August 25, 2025, which it described as defamatory, adding that a formal request for retraction was issued in September 2025 before legal action was taken after no compliance was recorded.

ALSO READ: Flood Control: Nani, Ochonogor Tour DESOPADEC Desilting Sites

The DSS noted that in several similar cases involving individuals and organizations, it has often sought judicial clarification or retraction rather than immediate arrests, citing past matters including the Prof. Pat Utomi “Shadow Government” case and other public misinformation incidents.

It further maintained that Sowore was granted bail on self-recognition at the commencement of trial, a decision it did not oppose, stressing that subsequent events leading to his remand were strictly within judicial processes and not operational enforcement by the Service.

Reaffirming its commitment to professionalism and the rule of law, the DSS said it would continue to ensure civility in its operations even in the face of provocation, while the outcome of the internal investigation will determine any disciplinary measures where necessary.